Correlation of The Application of Teaching At The Right Level (Tarl) With Students' Basic Literacy Outcomes

Authors

  • Noviandi Saputra Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Aswasulasikin Aswasulasikin Hamzanwadi University
  • Abdul Aziz Hamzanwadi University
  • Yuniar Lestarini Hamzanwadi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v2i3.152

Keywords:

Tarl Approach, Learning Outcomes, Basic Literacy

Abstract

This study aims to identify the correlation between the implementation of the TaRL (Teaching at the Right Level) approach and the improvement of grade I students' basic literacy learning outcomes. Using a quantitative correlational method, the study involved 25 students grouped into four ability levels: Special Intervention, Basic, Proficient and Advanced. The test results showed that 17 students were at the Special Intervention level, 1 student at the Basic level, 7 students at the Advanced level and none at the Proficient level. Meanwhile, to get data on learning outcomes, students were given multiple choice questions to measure their abilities. Data analysis using the Pearson Product Moment test showed a correlation value of 0.812, which is higher than the critical value of 0.396 at the 5% significance level. This indicates a very strong correlation between the application of TaRL and the improvement of basic literacy learning outcomes based on correlation interpretation. Thus, the null hypothesis (H0: no correlation) is rejected, and the alternative hypothesis (H1 : correlation) is accepted. In conclusion, the application of the TaRL approach is positively related to the improvement of students' basic literacy learning outcomes, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in literacy learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, K., Jannah, M., Aiman, U., Hasda, S., Fadilla, Z., Taqwin, N., Masita, Ardiawan, K. N., & Sari, M. E. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (N. Saputra (ed.)). Pidie: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.

Dadang, A., & Damaianti, V. S. (2021). Literasi dan Pendidikan Literasi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagogi, Andragogi Dan Heutagogi Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22, 65–71.

Kemdikbud. (2024). Pembelajaran Sesuai dengan Tingkat Kesiapan dan Pemahaman Peserta Didik. https://pusatinformasi.guru.kemdikbud.go.id/hc/id/articles/14142735013145-Pembelajaran-Sesuai-dengan-Tingkat-Kesiapan-dan-Pemahaman-Peserta-Didik

Lestari, F. D., Ibrahim, M., Ghufron, S., & Mariati, P. (2021). Pengaruh Budaya Literasi terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 5087–5099. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1436

Maryono, M., Pamela, I. S., & Budiono, H. (2021). Implementasi Literasi Baca Tulis dan Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1707

Mubarokah, S. (2022). Tantangan Implementasi Pendekatan TaRL (Teaching at the Right Level) dalam Literasi Dasar yang Inklusif di Madrasah Ibtida’iyah Lombok Timur. BADA’A: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.37216/badaa.v4i1.582

Nurhasanah, N., Ar, F., & Amalia, R. (2022). Analisis Data Ordinal untuk Mengetahui Tingkat Persetujuan Pengetahuan dan Pelaksanaan Visi dan Misi Jurusan Statistika FMIPA Universitas Syiah Kuala. Jurnal Peluang, 5158, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24815/jp.v10i1.27859

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Pisa 2022, I. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.

Poloju, K. kumar, Rao Naidu, V., Rollakanti, C. R., Manchiryal, R. K., & Joe, A. (2022). New Method of Data Collection Using the Kobo Toolbox. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 1527–1535. https://mail.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/3305

Pratham. (n.d.). Teaching at The Right Level. Pratham Foundation. Retrieved February 18, 2024, from https://www.pratham.org/about/teaching-at-the-right-level/

Rintaningrum, ratna. (2019). Explaining the Important Contribution of Reading Literacy to the Country’s Generations: Indonesian’s Perspectives. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(3), 936–953. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_5_Iss_3/Part_2_2020/5310_Ratna_2019_E_R.pdf

Sari, P. A. P. (2020). Hubungan literasi baca tulis dan minat membaca dengan hasil belajar bahasa indonesia. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 3(1), 141–152.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Sunaryati, T., Indriyani, L., Alpian, Y., & Maesaroh, S. (2024). Pendampingan Membaca Melalui Gerakan Literasi Untuk Meningkatkan Karakter Siswa SD. Jurnal Pelita Pengabdian, 2(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.37366/jpp.v2i1.3916

Suryani, A., K, S., & Mursalam, M. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Mind Mapping terhadap Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Murid Kelas V SDN no. 166 Inpres Bontorita Kabupaten Takalar. JKPD (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar), 4(166), 741–753. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jkpd/article/view/2373

Syafril. (2010). Statistika. Padang: SUKABINA Press.

Wahyudin, D., Subkhan, E., Malik, A., Hakim, M. A., Sudiapermana, E., LeliAlhapip, M., Nur Rofika Ayu Shinta Amalia, L. S., Ali, N. B. V., & Krisna, F. N. (2024). Kajian Akademik Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemendikbud, 1–143.

Wahyuni, M. P. N., & Darsinah, D. (2023). Strategi Pengembangan Literasi Baca Tulis (Praliterasi) untuk Menunjang Pengetahuan Anak. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3604–3617. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4799

Downloads

Published

09.11.2024

How to Cite

Noviandi Saputra, Aswasulasikin, A., Aziz, A., & Lestarini, Y. (2024). Correlation of The Application of Teaching At The Right Level (Tarl) With Students’ Basic Literacy Outcomes. IJE : Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 2(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v2i3.152