Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through the RAPQ (Read-Ask-Put-Question) Technique
Keywords:
EFL learners, reading comprehension, collaborative strategic reading, RAPQ TechniqueAbstract
This classroom action research aimed to improve the reading comprehension skills of eighth-grade EFL students by implementing the Read-Ask-Put-Question (RAPQ) technique at SMP NW Gelanggang during the 2024–2025 academic year. The research followed the standard planning, acting, observing, and reflecting cycle. Seventeen students participated in a one-cycle intervention that integrated the RAPQ technique into regular reading instruction. The technique involved four structured stages: reading the text, identifying and asking about the main idea, paraphrasing the idea using the students’ words, and generating and answering comprehension questions. Data were collected using pre-test and post-test assessments, supported by classroom observations and field notes. Quantitative results showed a significant improvement in students’ reading performance, with the mean score increasing from 8.18 to 17.29. A paired-sample t-test confirmed that this improvement was statistically significant (t (16) = -9.877, p < .001). The results indicate that the RAPQ technique fosters more active, strategic reading by encouraging comprehension monitoring and textual engagement. The study concludes that RAPQ is a practical, student-centered strategy for enhancing reading comprehension in lower secondary EFL contexts, particularly where students have previously relied on teacher-dominated instruction.
References
Alharbi, A. A. (2022). The effectiveness of using think-aloud strategies to improve EFL students' reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(3), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1203.14
Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2013). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Aminatun, D., & Oktaviani, L. (2020). The effectiveness of RAPQ strategy in reading comprehension class for senior high school students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 102–110.
Banegas, D. L., & Gerlach, D. (2021). Action research in EFL contexts: Teachers' engagement with their own practices. System, 103, 102637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102637
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.
Craig, D. V. (2009). Action research essentials. Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Fitrawati, F., & Tanjung, F. (2019). Exploring students’ problems and strategies in reading comprehension. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 371, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191221.052
Grabe, W. (2020). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Han, Y. (2019). Fostering EFL learners’ reading comprehension through collaborative strategic reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(2), 204–227.
Karimi, M. N., & Amiri, M. (2021). Learner engagement and text-based instruction in EFL reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 21, 1–18.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). The impact of strategy-based instruction on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. System, 91, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102263
Meniado, J. C. (2019). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. Reading Psychology, 40(6), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1617536
Mertler, C. A. (2021). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nation, I. S. P., & Yamamoto, A. (2022). The four strands approach to teaching reading. RELC Journal, 53(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688221991335
OECD. (2023). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Pouwerin, J. (2001). The use of RAPQ in teaching reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24(1), 35–46.
Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question–answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516–522.
Rahmat, A. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ difficulties in reading comprehension and their solutions. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(1), 75–84.
Rinjani, I. (2014). The effectiveness of using RAPQ technique in improving students’ reading comprehension. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of Lampung.
Robinson, F. P. (1970). Effective study (4th ed.). Harper & Row.
Sari, F. M., & Pranoto, B. E. (2021). Exploring the impact of RAPQ technique on EFL learners' reading comprehension. Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching, 225–232.
Schumaker, J. B., Denton, P., & Deshler, D. D. (2006). The RAPQ learning strategy. Learning Toolbox. http://coe.jmu.edu/learningtoolbox/printer/rapq.pdf
Sun, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Strategic reading instruction and its impact on EFL reading comprehension: A review. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 19(1), 152–167.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Widodo, H. P. (2018). A critical microethnographic study of classroom-based literacy practices in an Indonesian secondary EFL classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(1), 52–73.
Yang, C. (2021). Strategy-based reading instruction for EFL learners: Effects and perceptions. ELT Journal, 75(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa076
Zheng, X. (2022). Affective engagement in reading: The missing piece in reading instruction. Reading Psychology, 43(2), 133–153.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Maemunah, St. Ayu Surayya, Zukhruf Farizi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with EXEL agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
EXEL is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

