Pedagogical Gaps and Language Barriers: The  Relationship Between Teaching Methods and English  Learning Difficulties

Muhammad Surya Rifqi; Armin Fani

doi:10.61277/exel.v1i2.267

Authors

Muhammad Surya Rifqi STAI Rasidiyah Khalidiyah (RAKHA) Amuntai
Armin Fani STKIP Islam Sabilal Muhtadin Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61277/exel.v1i2.267

Keywords:

Teaching Method, English Learning Difficulties, Language Barriers, Pedagogical Gaps, Correlational Studies

Abstract

Language learning success in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts is strongly influenced by instructional practices employed in the classroom. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between teaching methods and students’ English learning difficulties at SMKN 4 Banjarmasin, focusing on areas such as pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, and comprehension. A quantitative correlational research design was employed. The population consisted of 90 second-grade students, from which 20 students were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from previous research and a classroom observation checklist. The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability, with a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.82. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize students’ perceptions, while Pearson Product Moment correlation was applied to examine the relationship between variables.

The findings revealed that students experienced the greatest difficulties in pronunciation and grammar, while vocabulary posed fewer challenges. Classroom observations indicated that limited instructional variation, inconsistent use of learning media, and insufficient adaptation to students’ proficiency levels contributed to these difficulties. The correlation analysis showed a significant negative relationship between teaching methods and learning difficulties (r = −0.68, p < .01), indicating that improved instructional quality is associated with reduced learning difficulties. These results suggest that clear explanations, varied teaching strategies, interactive activities, and targeted feedback can positively influence students’ English learning outcomes. The study concludes that enhancing teaching methods is essential for reducing learning difficulties and improving English instruction in vocational high school EFL contexts.

References

Africa and Beyond. The Oxford Handbook of History and Material Culture, 275.

Ajaj, I. E. (2022). Investigating the difficulties of learning English grammar and suggested methods to overcome them. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 29(6), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.29.6.2022.24

Al Nakhalah, A. M. M. (2016). Problems and difficulties of speaking that encounter English language students at Al Quds Open University. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(12), 96–101.

Anggraini, D., & Dewi, H. C. (2025). Teaching method in EFL classroom: Types and why teachers use it? BRIGHT: A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature. https://doi.org/10.29100/bright.v8i1.7165

Arghode, V., Brieger, E. W., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Adult learning theories: implications for online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development.

Aristotle. (2001). Aristotle's Theory of Language and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asenahabi, B. M. (2019). Basics of research design: A guide to selecting appropriate research design. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 6(5), 76–89.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crystal, D. (1997). English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drewal, H. J. (2020). Sensiotics, or the Study of the Senses in Material Culture and History in Elearnspace. Org, 14–16.

Fikni, Z., Maysuroh, S., & Soleh, M. A. (2023). The relationship between inadequate teaching method and students’ English learning difficulties. Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v10i1.3312

Gebhard, J. G. (2006). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language; 2nd Edition (A Teacher Self-Development and Methodology Guide). United States of America: University of Michigan Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching; 4th Edition. United Kingdom: Pearson Longman.

Hidayatulloh, S. M. (2025). Learning English pronunciation: Articulating EFL students’ voices on problems and strategies. English Journal of Merdeka Education Culture and Teaching of English. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i2.8496

Islami, R., Putrawan, G. E., & Riyantika, F. (2021). An analysis of students’ pronunciation errors of friction consonants in spoken production. International Journal of Educational Studies in Social Sciences (IJESSS), 1(2), 81–86.

Jazadi, I. (2008). The Politics of Curriculum (An Interpretive Study of English Language Teaching and Learning at High Schools in Indonesia). Nusa Tenggara Barat: Paracendekia NW Press.

Kalpana, T. (2014). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27–29.

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in Educational Research; From Theory to Practice. United States of America: Jossey-Bass.

Marquardt, M., & Waddill, D. (2004). The power of learning in action learning: a conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1(2), 185–202.

McLeod, S. (2015). Operant Conditioning: What It Is, How It Works, and Examples.

Mustakim, M., Jaya, N. M., & Jabri, U. (2025). Challenges in grammar learning among EFL students: A case study of an Indonesian university. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 8(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v8i1.2598