User Satisfaction Analysis of SMOPI Application: The Role of User Interface, Perceived Ease of Use, and Behavioral Intention at the Irrigation Engineering Center - Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing

Authors

  • Azharul Iman Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Muhammad Fauzan Azhmy Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Rini Indahwati Universitas Harapan Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61277/jmet.v3i1.166

Keywords:

User satisfaction Analysis, behavioral Intention, irrigation Engineering Center

Abstract

This research analyzed how the user interface, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention impact user satisfaction with the SMOPI application based on the technology acceptance model. A quantitative survey using a cross-sectional design collected data from application users through sampling. Structural equation modeling with SMARTPLS analyzed the results. The findings demonstrated that the user interface significantly influenced satisfaction, with a path coefficient of 0.645 and P-value of 0.021, indicating a comfortable and relevant interface enhances satisfaction. However, perceived ease of use and behavioral intention did not significantly impact satisfaction, recording path coefficients of -0.015 (P-value 0.947) and 0.189 (P-value 0.591), respectively. In closing, the user interface emerged as the most consequential factor in determining satisfaction with the SMOPI application. Optimizing features to align with consumer needs while refining the design were recommended to boost satisfaction overall. Adopting the technology acceptance model in this research provided useful insights into user acceptance and the satisfaction-influencing elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azeosoft. (2023). Building dynamic websites with server-side programming languages. Retrieved from https://azeosoft.com

Abdillah, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Terpadu Sistem Informasi

Barrett, J. et al.(2014). Landscape irrigation best management practices American Society of Irrigation Consultants.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Franque, J., et al. (2023). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms. Education and Information Technologies. Retrieved from Springer

Haryanto, A. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan dan Teknik Pengumpulan Data. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Heitmann, F., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Engel, S. (2019). Requirements Based Design of Environmental System of Systems: Development and Application of a Nexus Design Framework. Sustainability, 11(12), 3464

Hidayat, R. (2023). Pengembangan Kerangka Konseptual untuk Meningkatkan Validitas Penelitian. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 12(3), 45-60.

Hartanto, M. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian: Pendekatan dan Teknik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Haryanto, A. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan dan Teknik Pengumpulan Data. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hidayah S, dkk (2013). Sistem Manajemen Operasi Irigasi (SMOI V.1)

Lihawa, S.M. (2012). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk menganalisis sikap pengguna terhadap teknologi sistem informasi akademik.

Limna, A., Smith, R., & Tan, M. (2023). Perceived usefulness and satisfaction in AI-based educational tools: A study on user retention. International Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijet.2023.03.008

McLeod, R., & Schell, G. P. (2023). Management information systems. Pearson.

Mansyur, N. I., Pudjiwati, E. H., & Murtilaksono, A. (2021). Pupuk dan Pemupukan. Syiah Kuala University Press.

Merriam-Webster. (2023). Information Definition & Meaning. Retrieved from Merriam-Webster.

Nugroho, B., & Wibowo, T. (2023). Dasar-Dasar Statistik dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Oracle. (2023). What is a database? Retrieved from https://www.oracle.com/database/

Packetlabs. (2022). What is a dynamic web page? Retrieved from https://www.packetlabs.net

Putri, A. S. (2022). Peran Kerangka Konseptual dalam Penelitian Sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Terapan, 18(2), 78-92.

Pratama, A. (2023). Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Ilmiah.

Pratama, A., Wulandari, S. Z., & Indyastuti, D. L. (2022). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Pada Penggunaan Aplikasi PLN Daily (Studi Empiris Pada Pegawai PLN UP3 Tegal). INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen Indonesia, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v5i3.235

Putri, S. A. (2022). Perancangan Penelitian: Dari Konsep hingga Implementasi. Bandung: Penerbit Andi.

Ratten, V., & Jones, P. (2023). Integrating AI technologies into business practices: Effects on user satisfaction and continued use. Journal of Business Research, 158, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.08.001

Rahmawati, L. (2022). Perumusan Hipotesis dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 15(1), 55-70.

Rahardjo, B. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Bandung: IT Telkom

Rahmani, N. A. B. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi. Rahmani percetakan.

Roza, R., Fauzan, M. N., & Rahayu, W. I. (2020). Tutorial Sistem Informasi Prediksi Jumlah Pelanggan Menggunakan Metode Regresi Linier Berganda Berbasis Web Menggunakan Framework Codeigniter. Kreatif.

SoftwareLab. (2023). What is a Website? Everything You Need to Know. Retrieved from SoftwareLab.

Sinha, R., & Singh, J. (2022). Psychological factors affecting potential users’ intention to use autonomous vehicles. PLOS ONE. Retrieved from PLOS ONE

Santoso, B. (2023). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Hipotesis dalam Studi Empiris. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 20(2), 89-104.

Sutrisno, E. (2022). Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

Yu, J., Qadir, J., & Polyportis, A. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Factors influencing ChatGPT user satisfaction and continued use intention. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1354929

Wahditiya, A. A., Kurniawan, A., Nendissa, J. I., Meyuliana, A., Yora, M., Jamilah, J., Ilham, D. J., Mufaidah, I., Alaydrus, A. Z. A., Hidayati, F., & Andaria, A. C. (2024). Teknologi Produksi Tanaman Pangan. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Wijaya, T., & Nugroho, B. (2021). Kerangka Konseptual sebagai Dasar Perumusan Hipotesis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian, 29(4), 112-127.

Wijaya, T., & Prasetyo, A. (2021). Hipotesis sebagai Pedoman Penelitian: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian, 28(3), 123-138.

Downloads

Published

27.01.2025

How to Cite

Iman, A., Fauzan Azhmy, M., & Indahwati, R. (2025). User Satisfaction Analysis of SMOPI Application: The Role of User Interface, Perceived Ease of Use, and Behavioral Intention at the Irrigation Engineering Center - Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing. JMET: Journal of Management Entrepreneurship and Tourism, 3(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.61277/jmet.v3i1.166

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>