Design and Evaluation of ADDIE-Based Animated Video Instructional Materials for Enhancing Learning Outcomes in Primary Civic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v4i1.275Keywords:
Animated video instructional materials, ADDIE Model, Learning Outcomes, Primary Education, Civic Education, Educational TechnologyAbstract
Materials to enhance learning outcomes in primary civic education. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The study was conducted with second-grade students at SDN 01 Terara, involving a small group (n=6) and a large group (n=20). Data were collected through expert validation, questionnaires, and pretest–posttest assessments. The validation results showed that the instructional materials achieved an average score of 71%, categorized as valid. The practicality test indicated positive responses from teachers (70%) and students (70.1%), categorized as highly practical. The effectiveness analysis using the N-gain score revealed a moderate improvement in the small group (0.48) and a high improvement in the large group (0.58). These findings indicate that the developed animated video-based instructional materials are valid, practical, and effective in improving students’ learning outcomes. This study contributes to the field of educational technology by integrating multimedia learning with a systematic instructional design framework and providing empirical evidence of its effectiveness in primary civic education.
Downloads
References
Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68–72.
Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317501
Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287–296). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.018
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00223-1
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Visual, auditory, kinaesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i1.1007
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Nucci, L., & Narvaez, D. (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931431
OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2018). A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1087–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9437-8
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
